Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1477
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCordner, Thomasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-25T03:50:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-25T03:50:31Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-
dc.identifier.citationCordner T, Egerton T, Schubert K, Wijesinghe T, Williams G. Ballistic Resistance Training: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness for Improving Mobility in Adults With Neurologic Conditions: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):735-751. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/1477-
dc.description.abstractTo determine whether ballistic resistance training is feasible, safe, and effective in improving muscle strength, power generation, and mobility in adults with neurologic conditions. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2019 in addition to the reference lists of included articles. Articles were independently screened by 2 authors and were included if they were full-text; English-language articles published in a peer-reviewed journal; investigated ballistic resistance training for adults with a neurologic condition; and reported on feasibility, safety, strength, power, or mobility. Two authors independently extracted data. Study quality was assessed using the McMaster critical review form and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The search identified 1540 articles, with 13 articles describing 9 studies meeting the criteria for inclusion. Five studies were randomized controlled trials and 4 were cohort studies. Ballistic resistance training was feasible and safe with only 1 intervention-related adverse event reported. Findings indicated improvements in strength for hip abduction, leg press, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion, but not for hip flexion, hip extension, knee extension, or ankle plantarflexion. Muscle power generation improved for hip flexion, hip abduction, leg press, knee extension, and knee flexion, but not for ankle plantarflexion. Treatment effect was positive for self-selected walking speed, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-1.38) from 3 studies. However, fastest comfortable walking speed results were inconclusive with a SMD from 4 studies of 0.45 (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.91). Ballistic training is safe and feasible for people with a neurologic condition. The effects on muscle strength, power generation, and mobility were found to be positive but not conclusive.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectNeurological gait disordersen_US
dc.subjectNervous system diseasesen_US
dc.subjectMuscle strengthen_US
dc.subjectResistance trainingen_US
dc.subjectPlyometric trainingen_US
dc.titleBallistic Resistance Training: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness for Improving Mobility in Adults With Neurologic Conditions: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.023-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Sites:Gold Coast Health Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

110
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.