Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3847
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSnelling, P. J.en
dc.contributor.authorJones, P.en
dc.contributor.authorKeijzers, G.en
dc.contributor.authorBade, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorHerd, D. W.en
dc.contributor.authorWare, R. S.en
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T23:46:47Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T23:46:47Z-
dc.date.issued2021en
dc.identifier.citation38, (2), 2021, p. 139-145en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3847-
dc.description.abstractBackground Paediatric distal forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. They can be diagnosed with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative to X-rays. Given that ED nurse practitioners (NPs) are relied on for the diagnosis of paediatric fractures, it is important to describe the diagnostic accuracy of NP-conducted POCUS versus X-ray. Methods This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Queensland, Australia, between February 2018 and April 2019. Participants were children aged 4-16 years with a clinically non-angulated, suspected distal forearm fracture. Diagnosis from 6-view NP-administered POCUS of the distal radius and ulna was compared against the reference standard of 2-view X-ray. Each patient received both imaging modalities. Overall forearm diagnosis was classified as no', buckle' or other' fracture for both modalities. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for any' fracture (buckle' and other' fractures combined). Secondary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy for other' fractures versus buckle' and no' fractures combined, and pain, imaging duration and preference for modality. Results Of 204 recruited patients, 129 had X-ray-diagnosed forearm fractures. The sensitivity and specificity for NP-administered POCUS were 94.6% (95% CI 89.2% to 97.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI 75.6% to 91.6%), respectively. Other' fractures (mostly cortical breach fractures), when compared with buckle'/no' fractures, had sensitivity 81.0% (95% CI 69.1% to 89.1%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI 91.3% to 98.1%). Pain and imaging duration were clinically similar between modalities. There was a preference for POCUS by patients, parents and NPs. Conclusions NP-administered POCUS had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for paediatric patients presenting with non-angulated distal forearm injuries. This included good sensitivity for diagnosis of any' fracture and good specificity for diagnosis of cortical breach fractures alone. Given the preference for POCUS, and the lack of difference in pain and duration between modalities, future research should consider functional outcomes comparing POCUS with X-ray in this population in a randomised controlled trial.L6340624972021-02-09 <br />2021-03-09 <br />en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEmergency Medicine Journalen
dc.titleNurse practitioner administered point-of-care ultrasound compared with X-ray for children with clinically non-angulated distal forearm fractures in the ED: A diagnostic studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2020-209689en
dc.subject.keywordshumanen
dc.subject.keywordsmajor clinical studyen
dc.subject.keywordsmaleen
dc.subject.keywordsnurse practitioneren
dc.subject.keywordspediatric hospitalen
dc.subject.keywordspediatric patienten
dc.subject.keywordspoint of care ultrasounden
dc.subject.keywordspriority journalen
dc.subject.keywordsprospective studyen
dc.subject.keywordsQueenslanden
dc.subject.keywordsradiographyen
dc.subject.keywordsradius fractureen
dc.subject.keywordssensitivity and specificityen
dc.subject.keywordstertiary care centeren
dc.subject.keywordsulnaen
dc.subject.keywordsradiodiagnosisen
dc.subject.keywordsACTRN12617001648314Fujifilm Sonosite Xporteen
dc.subject.keywordsportable ultrasound scanneren
dc.subject.keywordsibuprofenen
dc.subject.keywordsnarcotic analgesic agenten
dc.subject.keywordsparacetamolen
dc.subject.keywordsadolescenten
dc.subject.keywordsarticleen
dc.subject.keywordschilden
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled clinical trialen
dc.subject.keywordscontrolled studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdiagnostic accuracyen
dc.subject.keywordsdiagnostic test accuracy studyen
dc.subject.keywordsdistal radiusen
dc.subject.keywordsemergency warden
dc.subject.keywordsFaces Pain Scaleen
dc.subject.keywordsfemaleen
dc.subject.keywordsforearm fractureen
dc.subject.keywordsforearm injuryen
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L634062497&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209689 |en
dc.identifier.risid1822en
dc.description.pages139-145en
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Sites:Children's Health Queensland Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

106
checked on Mar 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.