Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/397
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaakoush, N.en
dc.contributor.authorvan den Bogaerde, J.en
dc.contributor.authorParamsothy, S.en
dc.contributor.authorNg, W.en
dc.contributor.authorConnor, S.en
dc.contributor.authorLeong, R. W.en
dc.contributor.authorLin, E.en
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, A. J.en
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, D.en
dc.contributor.authorKamm, M. A.en
dc.contributor.authorBorody, T. J.en
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, H. M.en
dc.contributor.authorFinlayson, S.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-16T20:33:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-16T20:33:16Z-
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationInflamm Bowel Dis Jul 21, (7), 2015, p. 1600-6en
dc.identifier.otherRISen
dc.identifier.urihttp://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/397-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Increasing demand for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has created a need for stool banks sourced from long-term healthy donors. Here, we describe our experience in recruiting and screening fecal donors.METHODS: Mailbox, newspaper, and online advertisements were used. Potential donors were required to satisfy a prescreen telephone conversation, pass blood and stool investigations, then undertake a screening interview including medical history, physical examination, and evaluation of donor selection criteria. <br />RESULTS: One hundred sixteen potential donors were prescreened of whom 74 failed-47 declined based on study donation requirements (primarily related to frequency and duration of donations), 13 had medical comorbidities, 6 variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease risk factors, 8 for other reasons. Thirty-eight completed stool and blood testing-1 failed blood testing (indeterminate hepatitis C serology), whereas 15 failed stool investigations (5 Dientamoeba fragilis, 5 Blastocystis hominis, 1 B. hominis and D. fragilis, 1 Giardia intestinalis plus D. fragilis, 1 Norovirus plus Clostridium difficile toxin positive, and 2 leucocytes or erythrocytes on stool microscopy). Of the 18 potential donors proceeding to screening interview, 6 were excluded (3 body mass index >30, 1 illicit drug use, 1 uncontrolled anxiety and concerns regarding compliance, 1 irregular bowel movements after new medication commencement). In total, only 12 of 116 (10%) potential donors were enrolled as study donors. <br />CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of fecal donors for FMT is challenging with only a small percentage ultimately serving as donors. Many were unable or unwilling to meet the donor commitment requirements. A surprisingly large proportion of healthy asymptomatic donors failed stool testing, primarily due to gastrointestinal parasites. <br />Paramsothy, SudarshanBorody, Thomas J <br />Lin, Enmoore <br />Finlayson, Sarah <br />Walsh, Alissa J <br />Samuel, Douglas <br />van den Bogaerde, Johan <br />Leong, Rupert W L <br />Connor, Susan <br />Ng, Watson <br />Mitchell, Hazel M <br />Kaakoush, Nadeem <br />Kamm, Michael A <br />en
dc.languageenen
dc.relation.ispartofInflammatory Bowel Diseasesen
dc.titleDonor Recruitment for Fecal Microbiota Transplantationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000405en
dc.relation.urlhttp://scproxy.slq.qld.gov.au/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=prem&AN=26070003en
dc.identifier.journaltitleInflamm Bowel Disen
dc.identifier.risid568en
dc.description.pages1600-6en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Sites:Queensland Health Publications
Sunshine Coast HHS Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

504
checked on May 21, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.