Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/6563
Title: | Rapid uptake of adjunctive corticosteroids for critically ill adults with septic shock following publication of ADRENAL trial. A multicenter, retrospective analysis of prescribing practices in Queensland Intensive Care Units | Authors: | White, Kyle C Chaba, Anis Meyer, Jason Ramanan, Mahesh Tabah, Alexis Antony G Attokaran Kumar, Aashish McCullough, James Shekar, Kiran Garrett, Peter McIlroy, Philippa Senthuran, Siva Luke, Stephen Laupland, Kevin B |
Issue Date: | Dec-2024 | Source: | Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine, 2024 | Journal Title: | Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine | Abstract: | Septic shock is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The ADRENAL trial examined the use of hydrocortisone in patients with septic shock, demonstrating no difference in patient-centred outcomes but a decrease in the time to shock resolution. The change in clinical practice related to the publication of the ADRENAL trial is currently unknown. A retrospective cohort study examining the use of hydrocortisone in patients with septic shock was conducted in 12 intensive care units (ICUs). A segmented linear regression was performed to identify a stepwise change in hydrocortisone administration and 90-day mortality associated with the publication of the ADRENAL trial. We included 4,198 patients with a mean age of 58 years (standard deviation, SD17), and the median noradrenaline equivalent score (NEE) was 0.07 μg/kg/min (IQR 0.02-0.17). Segmented regression analysis for hydrocortisone administration identified two breakpoints, 3 months before and 6 months after publication, leading to three periods: Pre-publication, Transition, and Post-publication. Compared to the pre-publication period, the Transition and Post-publication cohorts had a higher proportion of hydrocortisone administration (28% vs. 34% vs. 43%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, after adjustment for temporal change, the transition period had a significant change in the slope of the proportion of patients receiving hydrocortisone (-0.1% per month vs. +1.4% per month; p = 0.026), whereas this was not statistically significant during the post-publication period (+0.1% per month, p = 0.66). After adjusting for confounders, the Transition and Post-publication periods were independently associated with an increase in hydrocortisone (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.14-1.77; p = 0.0015 and OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.74-2.36; p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, after adjusting for confounders, when compared to the Pre-transition period, the use of hydrocortisone was associated with a statistically significant decrease in 90-day mortality (14% vs. 24% absolute difference, aHR for hydrocortisone effect -0.81; 95% CI 0.65-0.99; p = 0.044). Publication of the ADRENAL trial changed clinical practice in Queensland ICUs with increased prescription of hydrocortisone for patients with septic shock with an associated reduction in mortality. | DOI: | 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101435 | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Central Queensland HHS Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.