Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dora.health.qld.gov.au/qldresearchjspui/handle/1/3847
Title: | Nurse practitioner administered point-of-care ultrasound compared with X-ray for children with clinically non-angulated distal forearm fractures in the ED: A diagnostic study | Authors: | Snelling, P. J. Jones, P. Keijzers, G. Bade, David Herd, D. W. Ware, R. S. |
Issue Date: | 2021 | Source: | 38, (2), 2021, p. 139-145 | Pages: | 139-145 | Journal: | Emergency Medicine Journal | Abstract: | Background Paediatric distal forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. They can be diagnosed with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative to X-rays. Given that ED nurse practitioners (NPs) are relied on for the diagnosis of paediatric fractures, it is important to describe the diagnostic accuracy of NP-conducted POCUS versus X-ray. Methods This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Queensland, Australia, between February 2018 and April 2019. Participants were children aged 4-16 years with a clinically non-angulated, suspected distal forearm fracture. Diagnosis from 6-view NP-administered POCUS of the distal radius and ulna was compared against the reference standard of 2-view X-ray. Each patient received both imaging modalities. Overall forearm diagnosis was classified as no', buckle' or other' fracture for both modalities. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for any' fracture (buckle' and other' fractures combined). Secondary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy for other' fractures versus buckle' and no' fractures combined, and pain, imaging duration and preference for modality. Results Of 204 recruited patients, 129 had X-ray-diagnosed forearm fractures. The sensitivity and specificity for NP-administered POCUS were 94.6% (95% CI 89.2% to 97.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI 75.6% to 91.6%), respectively. Other' fractures (mostly cortical breach fractures), when compared with buckle'/no' fractures, had sensitivity 81.0% (95% CI 69.1% to 89.1%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI 91.3% to 98.1%). Pain and imaging duration were clinically similar between modalities. There was a preference for POCUS by patients, parents and NPs. Conclusions NP-administered POCUS had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for paediatric patients presenting with non-angulated distal forearm injuries. This included good sensitivity for diagnosis of any' fracture and good specificity for diagnosis of cortical breach fractures alone. Given the preference for POCUS, and the lack of difference in pain and duration between modalities, future research should consider functional outcomes comparing POCUS with X-ray in this population in a randomised controlled trial.L6340624972021-02-09 | DOI: | 10.1136/emermed-2020-209689 | Resources: | https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L634062497&from=exporthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209689 | | Keywords: | human;major clinical study;male;nurse practitioner;pediatric hospital;pediatric patient;point of care ultrasound;priority journal;prospective study;Queensland;radiography;radius fracture;sensitivity and specificity;tertiary care center;ulna;radiodiagnosis;ACTRN12617001648314Fujifilm Sonosite Xporte;portable ultrasound scanner;ibuprofen;narcotic analgesic agent;paracetamol;adolescent;article;child;controlled clinical trial;controlled study;diagnostic accuracy;diagnostic test accuracy study;distal radius;emergency ward;Faces Pain Scale;female;forearm fracture;forearm injury | Type: | Article |
Appears in Sites: | Children's Health Queensland Publications |
Show full item record
Items in DORA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.